For decades, the standard model of cosmology has relied on a specific assumption: dark energy is a constant, unyielding force driving the universe apart. However, recent findings from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) have shaken this foundation. Preliminary data suggests that dark energy may not be constant at all. Instead, it appears to be evolving and potentially weakening over time.
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, known as DESI, is currently conducting a five-year survey to map the universe. Managed by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, this instrument is mounted on the Nicholas U. Mayall 4-meter Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona.
In April 2024, the collaboration released results from its first year of data collection. This dataset created the largest 3D map of the universe ever constructed. It includes more than 6 million galaxies and quasars, looking back as far as 11 billion years into the past.
The primary goal was to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). These are pressure waves from the early universe that froze into the distribution of matter. They act as a “standard ruler” for measuring cosmic expansion. When researchers analyzed this massive dataset combined with data from supernovae and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), they found a discrepancy. The expansion rate did not fit the prediction of a constant dark energy density perfectly. The data favored a model where dark energy is dynamic, changing strength as the universe ages.
To understand why this is revolutionary, you must look at the Lambda-CDM model. This is the current standard model of the Big Bang cosmology.
The DESI results suggest that “Lambda” might not be a constant number. In scientific terms, physicists look at the “equation of state” for dark energy, labeled as w.
Specifically, the results indicate that dark energy was stronger in the past and is now becoming weaker. This behavior is sometimes referred to as “thawing” dark energy. It implies that the engine driving the expansion of the universe is easing off the gas pedal.
In science, bold claims require high statistical confidence. The DESI team has been careful not to call this a definitive discovery yet, but the numbers are compelling.
When the DESI BAO data is combined with supernova datasets, the preference for evolving dark energy reaches a statistical significance of roughly 2.5 to 3.9 sigma.
While 3.9 sigma is tantalizingly close to a major breakthrough, it is not yet definitive. The collaboration is currently analyzing years two and three of their five-year mission. This incoming data will either cement the theory of weakening dark energy or force the data back in line with the standard constant model.
If dark energy is indeed weakening, it changes the forecast for how the universe will end. Under the standard constant model, the universe faces a “Big Freeze” or “Heat Death.” In this scenario, dark energy pushes everything apart so fast that galaxies become isolated, stars burn out, and the universe becomes a cold, dark void.
However, if dark energy weakens effectively, gravity could eventually become the dominant force again. This leads to very different possibilities:
The technology behind these findings is as impressive as the physics. DESI uses 5,000 tiny robotic positioners. These robots automatically swivel to capture light from thousands of galaxies simultaneously in 20-minute exposures.
By capturing the spectrum of light from these galaxies, DESI measures “redshift.” As the universe expands, light waves from distant objects stretch out, shifting toward the red end of the spectrum.
DESI looks at Lyman-alpha forest data, which involves observing distant, bright quasars. As light from these quasars passes through clouds of hydrogen gas, it creates a “forest” of absorption lines. This allows scientists to map the distribution of matter 11 billion years ago. Comparing that ancient expansion rate to the modern expansion rate is what revealed the potential weakening of dark energy.
Does this mean Einstein was wrong? Not necessarily. Einstein originally introduced the cosmological constant, then called it his “biggest blunder.” If dark energy evolves, it actually fits well with alternative theories of gravity or scalar fields that act within Einstein’s General Relativity frameworks. It simply means the “constant” part of his equation might be a variable.
When will we know for sure? DESI is a five-year project. The results released in 2024 were from the first year only. As the team processes data from years two and three, the statistical margin of error will shrink. We can expect more definitive answers around late 2025 or 2026.
What is the “Big Rip”? The Big Rip is a theory where dark energy gets stronger over time (Phantom Energy). It would eventually tear apart galaxies, solar systems, and finally atoms. The DESI results suggest the opposite is happening; dark energy is weakening, making the Big Rip scenario much less likely.
Is there any other evidence supporting this? The DESI data is most powerful when combined with other surveys. The team used supernova data from the Pantheon+ sample and the Dark Energy Survey (DES), along with CMB data from the Planck satellite. The strongest signal for weakening dark energy appears when these distinct datasets are combined, suggesting the trend is not just an error in the DESI instrument itself.